P a n a m a

2. SPECIFIC PRESS LAWS

There are three laws on this subject in force since 1978 that regulate social communication media, the practice of journalism and journalistic proficiency.

Law 11 of 1978 requires social communication media to submit a statement to the Ministry of Government and Justice in order to record the name of the organization, its legal representative, and its directors and stockholders in case of a corporation (Art. 1), who should be Panamanians (Art. 2) and other data on publication dates and the place where it is printed (Art.3).

This same law permits prior censorship by the Ministry of Government and Justice (Art. 15) and application of severe penalties, which even include closing down media (Art. 16) according to administrative procedures which do not comply with the safeguards of due process (Art. 18).

Among prohibitions provided in this law are those against publication of false news, doctored documents or documents attributed incorrectly to certain sources, facts relating to a person?s private life that may harm such a person, comments, references and insinuations about a person?s physical handicaps, the names of minors who have committed crimes or are in any way involved in criminal activity, and subscriptions or collections to indemnify individuals for fines, damages or other compensation imposed on those legally convicted for the commission of a crime (Art. 15).

According to Art. 9, every mass communication medium shall have a responsible director, who must be Panamanian, of legal age, and endowed with full civil and political rights. Said director shall be considered as the author of all publications made in the printed or broadcast medium concerned, except for articles endorsed by a recognized and authentic signature (Art. 10).

The practice of journalism is regulated by Law 67 of 1978 that provides for professional proficiency recognized by the Ministry of Government and Justice as a requirement to such a practice, understood as ?ongoing dedication to seek and write news, production of news media, graphic information or commentaries in social communcation media, as well as professional journalistic assignments in the public relations sections of public or private institutions.?

Law 68, also adopted in 1978, created a Technical Board on Journalism within the Ministry of Government and Justice, with the main function of issuing certificates of proficiency to practice journalism.

Decree 251, enacted on August 6, 1969, created the National Board of Censorship to check on public shows. However, the decree also established mechanisms of prior censorship applicable in a wide variety of media. Art. 17 disposes that ?the censors may order the suspension of publications and radio transmissions of disks or recordings when these threaten good morals and behavior; publications and recordings, available in bookstores and jukeboxes, that infringe the dispositions of this cabinet decree, may be withdrawn from circulation.? This decree clearly defines prior censorship.

There are also provisions in the Criminal Code on libel and slander which impose incarceration penalties for said crimes as well as other offenses against the national economy, drafted in such a general way that any journalist may be penalized for writing about inflation or fluctuation of securities in the public or private debt.

Law 68 of 1978 which created the Technical Board on Journalism shall control the implementation of the legal requisites needed to exercise the profession of journalist; issue certificates of professional ability to practice journalism; suspend journalists from such practice for infringing the Code of Professional Ethics for the period provided by this Code and cancel their professional certificates (Art. 2).

In Art. 1706 the Civil Code establishes civil due process for compensation for damages in cases of libel and slander. This action is subject to a statute of limitation one year after the injured party becomes aware of the offense.

If timely criminal administrative action is undertaken in cases cited in the previous clause, the civil action is subject to a statute of limitation on the date the criminal sentence or administrative resolution are executed, whatever case may apply first.

To admit civil due process, in no case is intervention by the criminal jurisdiction essential .



Back to main

 


questions or comments? e-mail us

Copyright © 1999 Inter American Press Association. All rights reserved.

 



Country Reports

  Argentina

  Bolivia
  Brazil
  Canada
  Chile
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Cuba
  Dominican Republic
  Ecuador
  El Salvador
  Guatemala
  Haiti
  Honduras
  Jamaica
  Mexico
  Nicaragua
  Panama
  Paraguay
  Peru
  Puerto Rico
  United States
  Uruguay
  Venezuela
 
Web
Project Web Site