62nd
General Assembly
Mexico City, Mexico
September 29 to October 3, 2006
Camino Real Hotel
Reports and Resolutions
|
BRAZIL
Report to the Midyear Meeting
Quito, Ecuador
Press
freedom has been affected by numerous attacks against journalists during this
period, as well as by a lack of access to police reports, which is worsening.
The federal government is planning
to send to Congress a bill to modify legislation on the tapping of telephone
conversations in Brazil that includes penalties of up to five years in prison
and a fine for those journalists who share the content of those recordings even
when they have been authorized by the courts. The Law on Telephone Tapping,
which amends the earlier law with a similar objective, is being justified by
the government as a way to prevent abuses and misuse.
Impunity is another constant problem. In January, the police investigation into
the murder of television host Edgar Lopes de Faria, more commonly known as Escaramuça,
was closed. Faria was murdered on October 29, 1997, in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso
do Sul. Investigations took a long time to be transferred to the police officer
at the Unit Against Criminal Organizations of the Special Office on Fighting
Organized Crime (UNICOC), André Matsushita Gonçalves. The case
was closed due to a lack of leads.
Célio Alves de Souza, a former
military soldier who in June 2005 was sentenced to 17 and a half years in prison
for his involvement in the murder of media executive Domingos Sávio Brandão
Lima Júnior, escaped from Pascoal Ramos Prison on July 24, 2005. To date,
investigations into the involvement of public employees in the escape have not
concluded and the prisoner remains at large. Previously, another suspect for
the same murder had escaped from the same prison under similar circumstances,
but was captured.
In the case of Manoel Leal de Oliveira,
murdered on January 14, 1998 in Itabuna, Bahía, police were able to identify
the perpetrators, but not the masterminds. One of the accused, Officer Mozart
Brasil, was convicted, but he is appealing the verdict and while awaiting a
decision he remains free and is going about his work as usual under the protection
of habeas corpus. The other defendant, Marcote Sarmento, was acquitted, but
Leal’s relatives complained to A Região newspaper that the judges
had been tampered with.
Other incidents adversely affecting
press freedom during this period:
On September 12, 2005, the Boletín
Informativo de la Policía Civil (Police News Bulletin) included a note
in which it prohibited police officers and military officials from giving interviews.
According to the police, their intention was not to censor their employees,
but to prevent taped phone conversations with suspects from being released to
the public.
In September 2005, a fire destroyed
80 percent of the headquarters of Diário de Marília and Diário
FM and Dirceu AM radio stations, of the CMN (Central Marília Notícias)
Group in São Paulo. On January 25, 2006, Bruno Gaudêncio Coércio,
Amarildo Barbosa, and Amauri Delábio Campoy, were sentenced to 12 years
in prison for planning and using excessive violence by attacking Diário
and Diário FM and Dirceu AM radio stations.
On October 26, 2005, in Teresina
(State of Piauí) the courts ordered the arrest of journalist José
de Arimatéia Azevedo, director and editorialist for Portal AZ, an Internet
portal, whose closure was ordered by the court. In the arrest warrant, the judge
described comments by the director of Portal AZ about attorney Audrey Martins
Magalhães as obscene and sexist, and based the arrest on a 1967 law on
press crimes. On October 29, the president of the Superior Court of Justice,
Edson Vidigal, accepted the habeas corpus petition filed by the journalist and
ordered his release, finding that Azevedo’s arrest violated society’s
right to be informed.
On November 22, 2005, Attorney General
Bruno Acioly sent e-mails to his colleagues stating his intention to request
that the courts clear the way for four journalists’ phone calls to be
tapped. According to O Estado de S. Paulo newspaper, in June, Acioly and his
colleague Raquel Branquinho asked the 10th Circuit Court of Justice in Brasilia
to lift the telephone privacy. Judge Maria de Fátima de Paula Pessoa
Costa decided that there was no basis to consider the request.
Despite the fact that Acioly did
not reveal names, the newspaper believed that Expedito Filho, Policarpo Júnior,
and Alexandre Oltramari could be among the journalists whose names appeared
on his request. The four reporters were not identified. In 1999, these journalists
wrote articles in Veja magazine on bankers that had used privileged information
on changes in exchange rate policies. Acioly, who investigated these accusations
for the Attorney General, wanted to force the journalists to reveal their sources
that proved the illegal acts.
On November 22, 2005, O Dia newspaper
had to reinforce security at its offices when management found out through “Disque-Denúncia”
(Dial-Complaint), a toll-free number to make complaints, that drug traffickers
from Morro da Providência, located in downtown Rio de Janeiro, were planning
a grenade attack on the offices in retaliation for a series of articles published
by the newspaper on trafficking in that neighborhood since last September.
In November 2005, 19 lawsuits against
the editor of Jornal Pessoal prevented reporter Lúcio Flavio Pinto from
traveling to Pará to receive the International Press Freedom Award given
by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). Juliana da Cunha Pinto, the journalist’s
daughter, had to travel to New York to receive the award on her father’s
behalf.
On November 24, reporter Helen Michelet,
a contributor to A Estância newspaper and press adviser for an opposition
politician in Guaruja, São Paulo, was attacked during a public hearing
led by Mayor Farid Madi, who refused to respond to Michelet’s questions
and insulted her and the newspaper. Two men grabbed her by the arms and kicked
her legs. The incident was photographed by a journalist from Clarín,
another local newspaper. The mayor’s press adviser alleged that the assailants
were civilians and that the mayor did not answer Michelet’s questions
because she worked for the opposition. The municipal civil defense coordinator,
Elvio José da Silva, was identified by police as one of the individuals
involved in the assault.
On December 16, photographers Eduardo
Alves and Sérgio Marques, director of Comércio da Franca newspaper,
in Franca, São Paulo, were arrested by police after arguing with them
about the photographer’s right to cover police activity in the main plaza
of the city.
In December 2005, the Justice Department
in São Paulo banned Folha Online from publishing reports on the corporate
espionage trial in which Brasil Telecom is charged with hiring Kroll to spy
on its competitor, Telecom Itália. A Folha has appealed the decision.
On January 6, 2006, photographer
Viviane Pinheiro de Azevedo, from Diário do Pará, was covering
the arrest of suspects for money laundering and fraud when she was shoved three
times by attorney Roberto Santos Araújo. All her colleagues present witnessed
the assault and Record Pará broadcast the confrontation.
On March 14, the prosecutor of Camaquã,
Rudimar de Freitas Rosales, subpoenaed three journalists from Correio do Povo
to testify on the invasion of the headquarters of businessman Aracruz Celulosa
in Barra do Ribeiro, when some 2,000 female members of the Landless Workers
Movement ransacked the company’s research laboratory. The journalists
were treated like criminals and pressured to reveal their sources on the Aracruz
incident to police.
The National Association of Magazine
Publishers (ANER) expressed its concern on the scope of the text of Regulations
#83 and 84 (from November 16, 2005) of the National Health Agency (Anvisa).
The regulations broadened restrictions on advertising for products such as beverages
and medicines.
ANER stated that “any form
of prohibition in reporting — whether it be through advertising or in
news stories — prevents people from being informed and making choices
and jeopardizes their fundamental rights as citizens: freedom of expression
and of the press.” ANER also reiterated its concern about various regulations
imposed on the media, including regulations on news, by Anvisa in the last six
months.
questions
or comments? e-mail us
Copyright © 2003 Inter American Press Association.
All rights reserved.
. |