|
Midyear
Meeting
Los Cabos
March, 12 - 15, 2004
Mexico
|
|
Country-by-Country Reports
|
PARAGUAY
Legal actions against
editors and reporters, especially by officials and former officials accused
of corruption or irregularities, adversely affected press freedom, and many
of the defendants were fined. One judge ordered a newspaper to reveal its sources.
A journalist received death threats. President Nicanor Duarte Frutos urged journalists
to practice self-criticism and suggested that some businessmen buy media outlets
to cover up illegal acts and disguise the true conditions of society.
On October 17, criminal judge Dionisio Nicolás Frutos ordered Aldo Zuccolillo,
editor of the daily ABC Color, to pay a fine equivalent to $15,500 to the government
plus a $12,500 personal award to the plaintiff in a defamation case brought
by Juan Ernesto Villamayor, a member of the governing Colorado Party.
ABC Color published short items in one of its columns implicating Villamayor
in the stripping of the assets of the Banco Nacional de Trabajadores, which
later went bankrupt.
The judge ignored case law that contradicted his ruling as well as the role
of the press in reporting suspected cases of public corruption, such as this
one, which unmasked political and union figures who later were sentenced to
prison terms.
The judge also ignored the fact that the plaintiff is a public figure and that,
thanks to the articles, both the judiciary and the public became aware of the
unfortunate stripping of the assets of an institution built with workers´
contributions.´
On October 17, Judges Miguel Angel Rodas and Graciela Rolón temporarily
barred the dailies ABC Color and La Nación from changing their employees’
work schedules, in response to an appeal by the Journalists Union of Paraguay
(SPP) and the Press Workers Union (SITRAPREN).
The two newspapers had decided to publish their Sunday editions on Sunday, changing
a decision made several years ago to publish them on Saturday afternoon. The
two unions claimed this substantially changed working conditions without the
workers’ consent.
The newspapers’ lawyers stated that management’s decision to publish
the newspapers on Sunday “is within the full exercise of their rights”
and that working conditions were not changed.
The unions’ appeals were denied, and the judges ruled that the venue they
had chosen was not appropriate for labor cases.
On October 20, Rosendo Duarte, correspondent of the daily Última Hora
in Salto del Guairá, 500 kilometers northeast of Asunción on the
border with Brazil, reported that a person he knew warned him that he had overheard
a conversation among four men who said they had decided to “silence”
the journalist “with bullets” because of his reports on activities
of the border mafia.
On October 23, Senator Juan Carlos Galaverna asked the Supreme Court to rule
on Aldo Zuccolillo’s appeal on the constitutionality of lower court decisions
convicting him of alleged offenses of libel and defamation against the legislator.
In the trial court, Judge Hugo López ordered Zuccolillo to pay a fine
to the state of 470 million guaranties, and an appeals court increased it to
571 million, or close to $100,000.
“It is imperative to order a personal award,” Galaverna said in
his written appeal to the court. He explained that he estimated the amount at
close to $200,000. The case is before the Supreme Court.
On October 31, an appeals court sentenced Luis Verón, a historian and
journalist of the daily ABC Color to 10 months in prison suspended, with community
service instead. He had been sued for libel by Luis Fernando Pereira, an architect,
because he criticized a restoration project the architect did on the historic
1759 Catholic church in Piribebuy, 70 kilometers east of Asunción. In
the trial court, Judge Dionisio Nicolás Frutos ordered Verón to
pay an $8,000 fine which was changed by the appeals court.
Recognized national and foreign experts backed up the journalist’s report
about the plaintiff’s ignorance of restoration techniques, and some said
the damage done to the church is irreversible. But the judges ignored their
reports.
The appeals court decision was appealed to the Supreme Court.
On November 13, Alfredo Jaeggli, a senator of the opposition Authentic Liberal
Radical Party and chairman of the Senate Finance and Budget Committee, severely
criticized the press for reports about increases introduced into the 2004 national
budget bill that were criticized by Finance Minister Dionisio Borda.
In a speech to senators, Jaeggli proposed approving a budget for advertising,
just as the executive branch allegedly does, in order to counter the criticism.
On November 16, Judge Dionisio Nicolás Frutos, demanded that the daily
Última Hora reveal its sources during a libel and defamation lawsuit
against the former justice and labor minister, Diego Abente. In a note to the
newspaper, Frutos ordered it to hand over to the court “all the information
received from Minister Diego Abente…or to indicate who is responsible
for providing this information.”
Judge Frutos’s order is unconstitutional, as Article 29 of the Constitution
states that journalists carrying out their duties “shall not be forced
to act against the dictates of their conscience or to reveal their sources of
information.”
The same judge is well known for other decisions against the media and journalists.
On November 24, President Nicanor Duarte Frutos insinuated that some businessmen
buy media outlets solely to “commit blackmail and extortion” and
“whitewash social reality.” He spoke during a series of interviews
he granted to the media on the occasion of the first 100 days of his administration.
He did not name businessmen who fit that description.
He also urged journalists to conduct “self-criticism” about their
true mission.
On December 30, an appeals court dismissed charges of “electoral crime”
against the news director of radio station Ñandutí, saying there
is no such crime.
Prosecutor Carmelo Caballero accused Rubín of “electoral crime”
saying that he had broadcast results of exit polls before it was permitted during
national elections April 27 of last year.
Rubín proved that the results that were broadcast were not from exit
polls but from a survey by a specialty company that had been authorized by the
Supreme Court.
On February 5, former president Juan Carlos Wasmosy sued Editorial Zeta S.A.
(the owner of ABC Color) and two of its journalists, Mabel Rehnfeldt and Nacha
Sánchez, for $10 million in punitive damages.
The two journalists published a series of investigative articles about irregularities
committed in the state oil company PETROPAR during Wasmosy’s administration
(1993-1998). They reported, among other things, that José Luis Manzoni
Wasmosy, the former president’s cousin, benefited from the company’s
shady dealings.
Wasmosy is frequently described as one of the most corrupt presidents in Paraguayan
history. After the lawsuit, ABC Color published many articles from local and
international publications about the corruption in his government. As a consequence,
the paper said, “Wasmosy will have to sue the entire world.” The
trial is continuing.
On February 27, Alejandro Domínguez Wilson-Smith, executive editor of
the daily La Nación, sent a letter to John F. Keane, the U.S. ambassador
in Asunción, questioning a report about Paraguay sent to Congress by
the administration in Washington. It specifically referred to the portion on
prosecutor Basiliza Vázquez of Ciudad del Este, 330 kilometers east of
Asunción.
The letter from a passage in the U.S. report that states, “Media outlets
controlled by contraband dealers published calls for a formal investigation
into her [Vazquez’s] actions.”
The editor of La Nación included with his letter numerous articles from
his newspaper and from ABC Color about the prosecutor which he said show “a
rapid and considerable increase in her assets which happen to coincide with
the time she was assigned to the prosecutor’s office.”
“Since when is a journalistic investigation that provides evidence to
support reports of corruption, such as embezzlement, illegal enrichment and
complicity with criminals, described by the State Department as a violation
of human rights?” he asked.
|